Legal Opinion

Castera v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1916No. Civ. No. 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District for Writ of Mandamus to compel respondents to restore a civil action to the calendar of the court and to proceed and determine the same. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Mandamus. There is now pending in the Superior Court of the county of Los Angeles and in the de partment thereof presided over by the respondent judge, an action in which one J. E. Youtz is plaintiff and the petitioner is one of the defendants. Petitioner and other defendants in that action, having been duly served with summons, filed a demurrer to the complaint. After the filing of his complaint, the plaintiff Youtz was imprisoned in the state penitentiary pursuant to his conviction of a felony, and is now undergoing • a three years’ term of imprisonment. On account of such imprisonment of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re BagwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. In Re GainfortDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API