Douglass v. Webb

Defendants appeal from an $18,000 judgment based on a jury verdict for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when a pickup truck in which she was riding rolled over an embankment; they raise three main issues—the insufficiency of the evidence and errors in reference to insurance and certain instructions.

In connection with appellants’ first point, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to respondent indulging all reasonable inferences in her favor. (Ades v. Brush, 66 Cal.App.2d 436 [152 P.2d 519].) Plaintiff’s husband, Jack Douglass, borrowed a Ford pickup truck from a coemployee…