Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Boylston National Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 2, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
The plaintiff Solomon seeks to recover money deposited with and alleged to have been paid out by the defendant without his order or direction on one hundred and forty-five different occasions between June 28, 1921, and September 29, 1923, amounting in all to at least $27,000. The Atlantic National Bank is the successor of the Boylston National Bank and the Commonwealth-Atlantic National Bank, and will be referred to as the bank. It was the plaintiff in four actions tried at the same time to recover on notes of Solomon who admitted his liability thereon.
The auditor appointed in the case found…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Inhabitants of Wakefield v. American Surety Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Dolan v. Boott Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Brackett v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Farnham v. Lenox Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Anderson v. Metropolitan Stock ExchangeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Dalton v. Post Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Salter v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Gechijian v. Richmond InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Lovell v. Commonwealth Thread Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.