Legal Opinion

State v. Mohr

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 28, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pek Curiam.

The defendant was indicted and convicted in the Cumberland Quarter Sessions for receiving a Ford car belonging to one Damon, knowing at the time that if was stolen property. It is urged as error that the court refused to charge the following request of the defendant: “The evidence as pro*262duced by the state attempts to prove a conspiracy to which the defendant was a party and not the receiving of stolen goods.” Assuming such to be the fact the defendant under the proof had entered into a corrupt agreement with the men who did the stealing to' take the stolen goods from them. Yet that…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EdelmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. State v. MosleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API