Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Edward L. Eyre & Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by W.W. Rutherford and another against Edward L. Eyre Company, and another, for an alleged conversion of turkeys by foreclosure sale under a chattel mortgage which was allegedly paid. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiffs appeal.

AFFIRMED. This is an action for conversion in which the plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit.

The property involved was a quantity of turkeys which the plaintiffs owned up to December 30, 1940, the date of the alleged conversion. On that day the defendant Edward L. Eyre and Co., claiming to exercise rights under two chattel mortgages…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calcagno v. HolcombOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Glaser v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Investment Service Co. v. SmitherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Plitt v. StonebrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API