Legal Opinion

State v. Poulin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 4, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Defendant David L. Poulin appeals from a conviction of gross sexual misconduct (17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (Supp.1987)) following a jury trial in the Superior Court (Kennebec County). As a result of a single incident of sexual intercourse between defendant and complainant, defendant was tried and convicted of both rape (17-A M.R. S.A. § 252(1)(B) (Supp.1987)) and gross sexual misconduct. On appeal, defendant contends that the conviction of gross sexual misconduct should be vacated as violative of the prohibition against double jeopardy and requests resentencing on the single…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. BunkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. CarmichaelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Newell v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BouchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. State v. ThorntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  3. State v. AllardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. State v. WalshSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API