Legal Opinion

Radloff v. Bragmus

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1943No. 33,269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Action to recover the balance of the purchase price of a flock of .turkeys claimed by plaintiff to have been sold to defendants on November 9, 1940. When plaintiff rested, defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted because, in the court’s opinion, he had failed to make a prima facie case. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

There is very little of dispute in the evidence. Viewing it in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the jury could have found these to be the facts: Over a period of some years plaintiff has been engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Day v. GravelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great American Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Arens v. Minneapolis-Moline, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Wheatley v. H. & H. POULTRY CO.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. State v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API