Legal Opinion

Beaty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1996No. 96-03252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Edwin H. Beaty, a/k/a Edwin Beatty, appeals an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm because his motion was not filed within two years of this court’s mandate in his direct appeal and does not allege a basis to extend the two-year period contained in rule 8.850(b). Mr. Beaty’s direct appeal was affirmed per curiam without a written opinion. We hold that a judgment and sentence become final for purposes of rule 3.850 when our mandate issues in a direct appeal in which the judgment and sentence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Ward v. DuggerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Nava v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beaty v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. TWARDOKUS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Botero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Tito Morell v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. Williams v. Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API