Legal Opinion

In re Stephens

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 23, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DITMABS, S.

On the settlement of the account of the administrator in this matter, it is found that Henry C. Harmon, á brother and one of the next of kin of said decedent, would have been entitled to the sum of $376.78, had no other parties appeared and claimed the same. Mary L. Harmon, however, the wife of said Henry 0. Harmon, appears, and claims said portion by reason of an assignment made to her, and dated July 6, 1888. Ellis A. Griffith also appears as receiver in third-party proceedings supplementary to an execution, issued on a judgment obtained by one Enos C. Sheldon against said Henry…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. In re ArkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re Redfield's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Dunn v. ArkenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re GallagherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API