Legal Opinion
Rosner v. Globe Valve Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
In each of these three actions the plaintiff sues for commissions claimed to have been earned by him as sales representative in certain territory in New York State. In the amended answer in each action the defendant has interposed six counterclaims which the plaintiff moves to dismiss on the ground that they do not constitute a cause of action.
Five of the counterclaims are for slander and the sixth is for breach by the plaintiff of the duties flowing from his employment.
The actual language of the alleged slander set out in each counterclaim is identical with that of the same numbered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. WintersNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- New York Society for the Suppression of Vice v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- King Kullen Grocery Co. v. AstorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walrus Manufacturing Co. v. Excel Metal Cabinet Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1957
- Robinson v. Bantam Books, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Isaacs v. Pan American Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Concentra Shipping Co. v. BlumNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Rosner v. Globe Valve Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949