Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Wells

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Yice-Chancellor.

The bill in this case presents the following facts : On the 19th day of August, 1862, a copartnership was formed by the complainant, the defendant (Edwin E. Wells) and one Henry I). Partridge, to carry on the produce commission business in the city of New York, which continued until *177January 3cl, 1871, when it was dissolved by the death of Henry I). Partridge. A settlement was then made by the complainant and defendant, and a new firm formed, consisting of themselves alone, which continued in the prosecution of the same business until October 12th, 1875, when it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kane v. BloodgoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1823

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kook v. American Sur. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Bacon v. BaconNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Bahr v. Breeze Corps., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API