United States v. Hahn
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
This was an application by the United States for a review of a decision of the hoard of general appraisers in respect to the classification for duty of certain articles imported by Rudolph C. Hahn.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
By section 2502 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the tariff act of 1883, “precious stones of all Mnds” were made dutiable at 10 per cent, ad valorem (22 Stat. 514); by section 2503, “agates, unmanufactured,” were made free (Id. 514); by section 2513, all articles manufactured in whole or in part,' but not therein enumerated or provided for, were made dutiable at 20 per cent. (Id. 523); and by section 2499 every nonenumerated article which bore “a similitude either in material, quality, texture, or use to which it” might be applied, was made dutiable at the same…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Erhardt v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- N. M. Albert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952