McLain v. General Motors Corp.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEBELEIN, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for new trial and defendant General Motors Corporation’s [G.M.] motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J.N.O.V.). For the reasons that follow, both motions are denied. 1
Maria McLain, [“plaintiff”], filed a products liability action against the defendants, claiming that she suffered personal injuries allegedly caused by a defectively designed seat belt restraint in a car manufactured by G.M. Trial in the case commenced before a twelve-member special jury on October 5, 1987. Twenty-three days later, on…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alejo Jimenez v. HeyligerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
- Burtch v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Thompson v. Papastavros Associates Medical Imaging, L.L.C.Superior Court of Delaware · 1998