Legal Opinion

McLain v. General Motors Corp.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 1, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEBELEIN, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for new trial and defendant General Motors Corporation’s [G.M.] motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (J.N.O.V.). For the reasons that follow, both motions are denied. 1

Maria McLain, [“plaintiff”], filed a products liability action against the defendants, claiming that she suffered personal injuries allegedly caused by a defectively designed seat belt restraint in a car manufactured by G.M. Trial in the case commenced before a twelve-member special jury on October 5, 1987. Twenty-three days later, on…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alejo Jimenez v. HeyligerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1992
  2. Burtch v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Thompson v. Papastavros Associates Medical Imaging, L.L.C.Superior Court of Delaware · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API