Legal Opinion
In re Thomas H.
New York City Family Court
Decided July 2, 1974PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrederick D. Dugan, J.
The three children of the respondents were enrolled for the school year 1972-1973 in the Gorham-Middlesex Central School District, where respondents and the children reside. The children were not enrolled for school in September, 1973 and none have attended upon instruction at that school during the year 1973-1974.
Had they gone to school, John, age 12, would have attended *413sixth grade, Thomas, age 13, eighth grade, and Robert, age 10, fifth grade.
The respondent parents contend that they are adequately instructing these children at home.
Separate petitions under article 10 of the Family Court,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- MATTER OF ZORACH v. ClausonNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Walker v. FosterNew York City Family Court · 1972
- In re CurrenceNew York City Family Court · 1963
- In re MyersNew York Family Court · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re William AA.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Christa H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re FranzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re KilroyNew York City Family Court · 1983
- In re Michael W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.