Wyatt v. New York, O. & WR Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Cireuit Judge.
The first contention of the appellant asserts that the plaintiff was not employed in interstate commerce at the time of the accident, and assigns error to the court’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon that ground. The facts bearing on this issue were substantially undisputed. Plaintiff was a brakeman in the employ of the railroad, and, on the evening of November 14, 1928, was engaged as one of a train crew which was making up an interstate freight train in appellant’s switchyard at Middle-town, N. Y. The train was being made up upon switch track…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ca 79-3053 Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Heagney v. Brooklyn Eastern Dist. TerminalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- American Textile MacHine Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Grosvener v. New York Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- In re KELLETT AIRCRAFT CORP.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.