Minno v. Pro-Fab, 2007-T-0021 (12-7-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Dissent
{¶ 53} Mr. Minno suffered terrible injuries as the result of his accident. It is natural to be sympathetic toward him. A jury has yet to decide to what extent, if any, See-Ann is liable to Mr. Minno for his injuries. However, this does not allow us, as a court, to misapply theBelvedere test in order to find Pro-Fab "fundamentally indistinguishable" from See-Ann, a separate corporate entity and Minno's employer, when both the facts and the applicable law make it clear that Belvedere does not apply. Moreover, even if we were to assume, arguendo, the Belvedere test was applicable, Minno has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bucyrus-Erie Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Products Corporation and John A. Hubly, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Assn. v. R.E. Roark Cos., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Leroux's Billyle Supper Club v. MaOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Beck v. CianchettiOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- North v. Higbee Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.