Cole v. State

The jury were authorized, under the evidence, to find that the defendant well knew that FPIA would not approve these applications on the part of the defendant and that the defendant had been so advised by the FHA. With this knowledge the defendant continued to accept deposits and applications from these owners. The defendant does not show that he returned to the owners any of the money which he received in excess above expenses.

The defendant relies on and calls our attention to only three decisions to sustain the contention of reversal. These are: Wylie v. State, 97 Ga. 207 (22 S. E. 954),…