Legal Opinion

In Re Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 29, 2009No. 13-09-00374-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice VELA. 1

Through this original proceeding, relator, Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Association (“Hochheim”), challenges an order denying severance of claims against it. As stated herein, we conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

I. BACKGROUND

Hochheim provided insurance coverage under three separate policies to Maricela Pena Cantu, Rene R. Cavazos, and Jaime and Sandra Galpern, the real parties in interest, for them three separate dwellings and personal property. Real parties sustained damage to them homes as a result of windstorm, hail storm, and/or water…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. in Re American National County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  3. In Re Devon Energy Production Co., LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010
  4. In re: Texas Farm Bureau UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Cobayashi v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API