Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Tomes

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1878Published

Appeals by Adrian Isolin from an order denying his motion to be relieved from his purchase on a foreclosure sale, and from an order requiring him to complete such purchase.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, P. J.:

Both of these appeals involve the same questions. We think that all the objection made by the petitioner to the sufficiency of the title were properly disposed of by the court below, except one.

It appears in the case, that in the above entitled action, notice of lis pendens was filed on the 22d of November, 1877 ; that on the 9th of January, 1878, one Melvain, who had recovered a judgment against Benjamin Tomes, commenced an action to set aside the conveyance by Tomes to his wife of the premises, covered by the mortgage in this action, charging that it was fraudulent as against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Smith v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API