Legal Opinion

Borteck v. Goldenburg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1925No. Appeals 316 and 317PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This court held in Spang v. Adams Express Co., 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 107, that the Practice Act of 1915 (P. L. 483) did not repeal the provisions of the Act of June 13,1836, P. L. 572, relative to the commencement of actions of assumpsit and trespass by writ of summons; “that it was not the legislative intention to provide by this act, [Act of 1915], a system complete in itself for the collection of claims by action of assumpsit or trespass” (p. 110). We are likewise of opinion that the Act of 1915, supra, has not abrogated section 33 of the Act of 1836, supra, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. TozierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Spang & Co. v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Black v. JohnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monroe Contract Corp. v. Harrison Square, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Allegheny County v. Virgin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1957
  3. Signora v. Kaplan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1996
  4. Simonson v. Martin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County1963
  5. Deemer & Co. v. Kline Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API