Veazie v. Parker
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Writ of entry. Statement of facts by the parties. From this statement, it appeared, that both parties claim under Joel Hills.
Read the full summary
Writ of entry. Statement of facts by the parties. From this statement, it appeared, that both parties claim under Joel Hills. The title of the demandants was by deed from the Casco Bank, March 1, 1839 ; and the title of the bank was by virtue of an attachment of all right, title and interest which Hills had to any real estate in the County of Penobscot, wherein the land lies, made on Jan. 25, 1836, on a writ in favor of the bank against Hills and others; and a due and seasonable levy of their execution on the demanded premises, Dec. 22, 1838, and a seasonable record thereof. The tenant…
1Opinion of the Court
This case was argued at June Term, 1842, and the opinion of the Court was delivered at Oct. Term, 1843, as drawn up by
Shepley J.
-It appears from the case agreed, that Joel Hills, on the 16th November, 1835, conveyed the premises to the tenant by a deed, which was not recorded until the 13th July, 1837. And that the tenant on the same 16th of November, re-conveyed the same to Hills in mortgage, which was recorded on the same day. On the 25th of January, 1836, the Casco Bank caused all right, title and interest, which they or either of them have to any real estate in the county to be attached…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wilkins v. BevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Richardson v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Lash v. HardickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1878
- Losey v. SimpsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1856