Legal Opinion

Raynor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1976No. 75-1503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal we are of the opinion that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support a conviction of breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit a felony, to wit, grand larceny as proscribed by the then effective statute, section 810.01, Florida Statutes. In particular, the State failed to introduce evidence to demonstrate what the market value of the items taken was at the time of the theft. Platt v. State, 291 So.2d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The only pertinent evidence in this record came from the victim’s son who identified the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Platt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Gamble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marcum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. J. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. JM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API