Legal Opinion
Durrant v. Christensen
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1990No. 17678Published
1Opinion of the Court
785 P.2d 634 (1990)
117 Idaho 70
Orvil DURRANT and Faye Durrant, husband and wife; Kenneth W. Sellers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Respondents,
v.
Ruby CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant.
No. 17678.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
January 17, 1990.
Whittier, McDougall, Souza, Murray & Clark, Ctd., Pocatello, for appellants. John Souza, argued.
Robert M. Kerr, Jr., Blackfoot, for respondent.
BOYLE, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellants, Orvil and Faye Durrant and Kenneth W. Sellers, (hereafter "Durrant and Sellers") bring this appeal challenging an order by the district court awarding attorney fees and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.