Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Petitioners1 appeal from an order of the Board of Directors (Board) of the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), which accepted a hearing examiner’s recommendation to exclude Petitioners from the benefits provided by the Urban and Rural Teacher Loan Forgiveness Act (Loan Act), Act of December 6, 1988, P.L. 1259, 24 P.S. §§ 5191-5197. We affirm.
The Loan Act provides for a reduction in the educational loan amount that recipients must repay if they teach in urban or rural school districts where over 8% of the average daily membership are low income pupils.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Samilo v. PA. INSURANCE DEPT.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hawkins v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance AgencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Cherry v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- West Penn Allegheny Health System v. Medical Care Availability & Reduction of Error FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Yussen v. Medical Care Availability & Reduction of Error FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.