Legal Opinion
United States v. Hickman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 11, 1946No. 8888PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Hickman as principal and Parker as surety, executed a recognizance bond before a United States Commissioner, conditioned upon the appearance of the principal on April 3, 1945, in connection with a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 408e. The recognizance bond contained the usüal provisions for judgment by confession in the event of default. Hickman failed to appear. The Commissioner entered an order forfeiting the bond and on April 6, 1945, a judgment was entered against defendants for $2,500, the penalty of the bond and costs. April 18, 1945, Hickman was apprehended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Continental Casualty Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. NordenholzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Kelleher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- State v. AscencioCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- United States v. LeggCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dist. Dir., INS, USD of Jus.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Stuyvesant Insurance v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.