Legal Opinion

Kannenberg v. Conestoga Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1906No. Appeal, No. 304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Negligence — Street railways — Crossing—“Stop, look and listen” — Car and wagon — Nonsuit. In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries it appeared that the plaintiff was riding in a closed laundry wagon going in the direction in which the cars ran, and the only precaution he took before crossing the tracks was to stop and look back when twenty-five or thirty feet from the crossing.

Read the full summary

Negligence — Street railways — Crossing—“Stop, look and listen” — Car and wagon — Nonsuit. In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries it appeared that the plaintiff was riding in a closed laundry wagon going in the direction in which the cars ran, and the only precaution he took before crossing the tracks was to stop and look back when twenty-five or thirty feet from the crossing. He then drove on slowly and without looking again turned across the tracks, and was struck by a car which he could have seen if he had looked again before turning or when…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff was riding in a closed laundry wagon going in the direction in which the cars ran, and the only precaution he took before crossing the tracks was to stop and look back when twenty-five or thirty feet from the crossing. He then drove on slowly and without looking again turned across the tracks, and was struck by a car which he could have seen if he had looked again before turning or when at the edge of the tracks. He disregarded a duty established by an unbroken line of decisions on the subject extending from Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Pass. Railway Co., 150 Pa.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehrisman v. East Harrisburg City Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Moser v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911
  2. Bridgman Realty Corp. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Bane v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API