Legal Opinion

Ledford v. Rikes (In re Fields)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 26, 1985No. Bankruptcy No. 3-84-02255; Adv. No. 3-85-0005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is a case arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court is determined to be a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K), in which the plaintiff-Chapter 13 Trustee disputes the validity, extent and priority of a lien.

Plaintiff-trustee’s complaint against defendant-creditor, Shillito Rikes, alleges that under 11 U.S.C. § 544, OH.REV.CODE ANN. § 1309.20 [U.C.C. § 9-301] and § 1309.31 [U.C.C. § 9-312] (Page…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commonwealth Loan Co. v. BerryOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mixon v. Georgia Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Passieu v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rieser v. Randolph County Bank (In Re Masters)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
  2. Luper v. Guardian Finance Co. (In re McAlmont)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  3. In RE McALMONTUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API