Legal Opinion
Thinguldstad v. United States
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 1, 1972No. Civ. A. 68-243PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Ruth E. Thinguldstad, brought this action individually and as executrix of the estate of Arthur M. Thinguldstad, deceased, against the United States under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act. The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 1346(b).
As required by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2402, this action was tried to the Court without a jury. As required by Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law shall…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Florence Wattles Hartz, Margaret Elwyn Roth and Globe Indemnity Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Furumizo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re N-500L CasesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Betesh v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Charlotte Joan Yates v. United States of America, Eagle Star Insurance Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Associated Aviation Underwriters v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.