People v. Rodriguez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We cannot say on the facts of this case that the Trial Judge’s denial of defendant’s application for a second competency hearing was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law, either under CPL 730.30 or 730.60 (subd 2) as it read at the time of defendant’s trial.
The other error alleged, not having been preserved for review by appropriate objection or request for curative instruction, is beyond our power of review.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order…
2Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. McGarrityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. CokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.