Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We cannot say on the facts of this case that the Trial Judge’s denial of defendant’s application for a second competency hearing was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law, either under CPL 730.30 or 730.60 (subd 2) as it read at the time of defendant’s trial.

The other error alleged, not having been preserved for review by appropriate objection or request for curative instruction, is beyond our power of review.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. DavenportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. McGarrityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. CokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API