Legal Opinion

Winter v. United States

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided February 28, 1985No. Civ. No. A4-82-76PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

In this action the plaintiff, Keith D. Winter, seeks to quiet title to 50% of the oil, gas, and other minerals (excluding coal) under 320 acres of land in McKenzie County, North Dakota. Keith Winter is the successor in interést to David Winter.

The case is presented on stipulated facts and evidence The action arises under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2409a.

In resolution of this case, the chronology is important and the facts are organized accordingly.

*391914 The United States issued its patent Covering Twp. 149 N, Range 103 W, Section 14, NE'A

1920 The United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. John McCann Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. T. Coughlin, Iii, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Winter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API