Legal Opinion

Cameron & Co. v. E. O. & Cates

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the County Court of Wise. Tried below before Hon. S. G. Tankersley.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

—This case is in all substantial particulars the same as cause No. 3346, E. O. and D. C. Cates, appellants, v. E. Riley et al., appellees, this day decided by us, save that in the latter case William Cameron & Co. are appellees, and herein are plaintiffs in error, the writ of error having been sued out after the appeal in said cause No. 3346 had been duly perfected and the transcript filed in this court.

We think it unquestionably true that the questions herein presented might have been as effectively presented by plaintiffs in error by cross-assignments -of error in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duren v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Cranfill Bros. Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Ward v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. City of Dallas v. Dean Carlton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API