People v. Elliott

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The statements made by the codefendant were admissible against defendant because the proof established that they were partners in the crime of promoting prostitution and that the statements were made by the codefendant during the commission of the crime and in furtherance thereof (see, People v Salko, 47 NY2d 230, 237, rearg denied and mot to amend remittitur granted 47 NY2d 1010; People v Luciano, 277 NY 348, 358, rearg denied 278 NY 624, cert denied 305 US 620). It was not necessary that the indictment charge the crime of conspiracy (People v…