State v. Hagerman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. ■ Indictment for an assault with intent to commit a rape. There was a conviction, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
l. criminad law: rape: degi-ee oi force, The following instruction was asked by the defendant and refused by the court: “The jury must be satisfied, not only that the prisoner intended to gratify . . . „ , , t . , his passions on the person ot the prosecutrix, but that he intended to do so at all events, notwithstanding any resistance on her part; and if the jury does not so find from the evidence they should acquit.” The evident meaning of this instruction is that before there could be a verdict of guilty the jury must be satisfied “ the prisoner intended to gratify his passions on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. EllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. BaskinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stevens v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.