Duncan v. State

BLACK, Judge.

Michael Duncan challenges the final judgment of restitution entered following his no contest plea to burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. Because the restitution amount was not supported by competent, substantial evidence, we reverse.

At the restitution hearing, the victim testified that a television, two antique rifles, 400 to 500 gemstones, and $22 were stolen from her home. To establish the value of the. television, the victim testified that she purchased it one or two years ago for $1300 and that.it was in good condition. The victim purchased a replacement television for…