Legal Opinion

Robert F. Bullock, Inc. v. Thorpe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 4, 1987No. 43800PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to review the question of whether a manufacturer can be liable under OCGA § 51-1-11 when a new product is placed in the hands of another for a try-out period prior to any actual sale. Although the Georgia statute uses the term “sold” when defining liability under strict liability for a “manufacturer of any personal property sold as new . . the Court of Appeals held that in order to effectuate the purpose of the statute, “sold” would be construed to mean “placed in the stream of commerce.” Thorpe v. Robert F. Bullock, Inc., 179 Ga.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Thorpe v. Robert F. Bullock, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  2. Boyce v. Gregory Poole Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Jenkins v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. English v. Crenshaw Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Alexander v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API