Legal Opinion

Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1935No. 5585Published

1Opinion

*56On Petition for Rehearing. (December 5, 1935.)

The defendant Home Indemnity Company and the Individual defendants filed a stipulation showing settlement of this action and asked for a rehearing and at the same time for modification of the opinion to comport with the stipulation. From the stipulation, it would appear that the settlement was made largely because of the filed opinion. We cannot grant a rehearing for the purpose of dropping out of the opinion parts unsatisfactory to counsel and leaving in other parts evidently satisfactory to counsel. If the opinion is to be modified, it should be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Napoleon Hill Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API