Moore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant pled nolo contendere to and was adjudicated guilty of the unlawful purchase of cocaine in violation of Section 893.13(l)(a)(l), but specifically reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the information. The motion to dismiss alleged that Chapter 87-243, Laws of Florida, violates Article III, Section 6, Florida Constitution, because it violates the “one subject rule.” This issue has been considered by this Court on previous occasions, the latest of which is Keegan v. *772State, 553 So.2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), and this appeal is affirmed for the reasons…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keegan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gladin v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990
- Pryor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990