Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Barthold

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1914No. 8014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Parker County; F. O. McKinsey, Judge. Action by H. D. Thomas and others against C. C. Barthold and others. There was a judgment awarding plaintiffs partial relief, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

H. D. Thomas recovered a judgment against C. C. Barthold, G. M. Bowie, G. S. White, and John Prince for $750 expended by him in the purchase of 7% shares of preferred stock in the Weather-ford Gas, Light, 1-Ieat & Power Company, a private corporation, of whom defendants were officers and directors, and from the further judgment rendered in the case denying him a recovery for the additional sum of $1,500, the amount paid by him for 15 shares of common stock in the same corporation, he has prosecuted a writ of error.

The basis of the claim asserted by plaintiff consisted in allegations,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barthold v. ThomasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Clinton Mining & Mineral Co. v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
  3. El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. La LondeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API