Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1984Published

1Concurrence

Asch, J. (concurring).

I agree with the result reached by the majority but not with the route followed to reach that destination. I do not believe that the claim of the plaintiffs can be sustained under sections 50 and 51 of the Civil Rights Law. It is some 90 years after Samuel Warren and *185Louis Brandeis urged that the privacy of citizens be protected from unauthorized intrusion (The Right to Privacy, 4 Harv L Rev 193). Since that time a miscellany of actions have been allowed authorizing claims for commercial misappropriation of one’s name or likeness or the intrusion into an individual’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Indig v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Flores v. Mosler Safe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Bernstein v. National Broadcasting CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  5. Wojtowicz v. Delacorte PressNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API