Legal Opinion
City of Sarasota v. AFSCME Council '79
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 6, 1990No. 90-720PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO REINSTATE STAY
2Per curiam
The City of Sarasota files a motion to reinstate the automatic stay provision of Rule 9.310(b)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because the city has failed to present this court with a record of the proceedings below, we are unable to determine if the lower tribunal abused its discretion and we therefore deny the motion.
The city has taken an appeal from a final order of the Public Employees Relations Commission, which certified AFSCME Council 79 as a collective bargaining unit. Because the city is a public body as contemplated by Rule 9.310(b)(2), the…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Neale v. AycockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Aleshire v. AckermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- City of Jacksonville Beach v. Public Employees Relations CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
4Cited by3 opinions
- City of Palm Bay v. STATE, DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Clear Channel Metroplex, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Moss & Associates, LLC v. Daystar Peterson and Brickell Heights East Condominium Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025