Legal Opinion

Estill v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Carroll, Curry, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

This is a suit by the payee, against the maker of a promissory note for $1500. The answer admits the defendant’s signature, but avers that the consideration for which the note was made has failed ; that it was given for a tract of land sold to the defendant, by the plaintiff, which the defendant had himself originally sold to James A. Clarke, of Chicot county, Arkansas ; that in this sale it was expressly stipulated, that the defendant should have the privilege of purchasing back his land at the rate of twenty dollars per acre, the price paid to him by Clarke ; that the latter after-wards…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Soulié v. RansonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API