Legal Opinion

State v. Johanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 3, 1926No. 25,634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Convicted in justice court of maintaining a nuisance in tbe nature of a dispensary of intoxicating liquor, defendant attempted to appeal to the district court. He neglected to have his appeal bond approved by the justice. The statute requires in connection with such an appeal “a recognizance, with sufficient surety, to be approved by the justice.” G. S. 1923, subd. 1, § 9129. Such a recognizance, so approved, is jurisdictional. This is an appeal from the order of the district court dismissing the attempted appeal from the justice court. For the reason indicated, that order was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Luverne v. SkybergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API