Legal Opinion

Rohrback v. Dauer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 1985No. 84-603PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

We reverse the final summary judgment in favor of appellees on a finding that they failed to meet their burden of conclusively establishing the lack of genuine issues of material fact with regard to: (a) when Rohrback knew or should have known of his right to a cause of action so as to trigger the running of the statute of limitations, Rosen v. Sparber, 369 So.2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 376 So.2d 76 (Fla.1979); (b) whether they (ap-pellee;s) lacked knowledge of Rohrback’s intention to assert his rights and whether they were prejudiced by his delay in bringing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. KelseySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. v. Nob Hill AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Baldassarre v. Rare Metals Derivatives, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Hiatt v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Chaires v. North Florida Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. PritchettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API