Legal Opinion
State v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 31, 1975No. 7247PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
On September 3, 1974, the defendant, a New
Hampshire resident since 1968, was convicted in the Gorham District Court of operating a car without a license to drive in violation of RSA 261:13; cf. RSA 261:19. On appeal to the superior court, he was again convicted in a jury-waived trial de novo. The Trial Court (Bois, J.) reserved and transferred the defendant’s exceptions.
The defendant claims that the provision of RSA 261:1 requiring surrender of all valid operator’s licenses issued by other jurisdictions as a prerequisite to the issuance of a New Hampshire driver’s license is violative of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bryson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. LaubSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WoodmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bragg v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Dana v. PetitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978