Legal Opinion

New York Life Ins. Co. v. McLaughlin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 5, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

In 1925 the plaintiff insurance company issued to the defendant Michael H. McLaughlin two life insurance policies. These carried double indemnity and disability benefits and called for extra stated premiums to cover the extra risks. Premiums were due each second day of September, with a grace period of one month allowed for payment. If premiums were not so paid the policies would lapse except as to certain benefits, such as cash surrender values, paid up insurance, or continued insurance. The policies provided for reinstatement within five years after any default upon written application by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  2. Billings v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  3. Fitzgerald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Mascott v. First National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
  5. Schofield's Admx. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. KnutsenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. McAllister v. AVEMCO InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. Martell v. Universal Underwriters Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Sarvis v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API