Legal Opinion

United States v. Baylin

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 26, 1982No. Cr. A. 81-22PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

At issue in this case is what information a court may permissibly consider in formulating an appropriate sentence for a convicted defendant, and the extent to which the government, through a plea agreement, may impose restraints on the information which a court may otherwise properly receive prior to sentencing. Herbert Baylin has filed a second petition for habeas corpus relief under § 2255 on the ground that the court which imposed sentence upon him erroneously relied upon: (1) unfavorable information transmitted to the court by the pre-sentence report, in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Terryl Geer, A/K/A Terry GeerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. CovertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API