Legal Opinion
Gere v. Canal Boiler Works
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 9, 1940No. 16PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge.
The plaintiff filed his bill of complaint against the defendants, complaining that they had infringed a certain patent for a new and useful method of manufacturing water or hydraulic pipe, granted to one Cecil R. Smith, February 23, 1932, No. 1,846,368, of which plaintiff was the assignee.
The suit was brought on the patent, a copy of which was admitted in evidence which contains allegations that the invention patented had gone into extensive use. The bill further alleges that the defendants have ’ been notified of plaintiff’s ownership and rights under the patent, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- National Cash-Register Co. v. LelandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- Hitchcock v. American Plate Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
- Cahoone Barnet Manuf'g Co. v. Rubber & Celluloid Harness Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Miami Copper Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thermo King Corp. v. White's Trucking Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Thermo King Corporation and Dawes Manufacturing Company, Appellants-Appellees v. White's Trucking Service, Inc. And Transicold Corporation, Appellees-Appellants. White's Trucking Service, Inc. And Transicold Corporation, Appellees-Appellants v. Thermo King Corporation and Dawes Manufacturing Company, Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961