Legal Opinion

In re Einhorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department moves for an order confirming a hearing panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and for the imposition of appropriate discipline upon respondent.

Respondent Joseph J. Einhorn was admitted to practice in the First Department on June 17, 1931, and maintains an office for the practice of law in the First Department.

On October 18, 1978, pursuant to a settlement agreement between New York Metro Corporation and Federated Development Company, respondent and Robert A. Katz, Esq., both attorneys for New York…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. In re StultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. In re FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. In re LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re PressmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In Re DamonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. In re WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re AltschulerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. In re LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API