Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Fitzpatrick & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.

Motion by respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (hereinafter referred to as MVAIC) for a stay of arbitration on the ground that the claimant [petitioner] has failed to serve a demand for arbitration prior to the expiration of the Statute of Limitations.

Claimant is an “insured” person and claimant’s insurance carrier an “ insurer ” under the provisions of section 601 of the' Insurance Law. On December 27, 1959, the insured was involved in an automobile accident allegedly caused by an uninsured motorist. On May 23, 1963, she served a demand for arbitration, dated April…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between La Marsh & Maryland Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between De Luca & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Schleif v. Hardware Dealer's Mutual Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Yingling v. PhillipsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Mendlein v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Larrystine Bates v. Michael J. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API