Randall v. Ditch
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Court. — Hon. W. B. Quaeton, Judge. Action at law to recover tbe purchase price of certain hogs sold and delivered the defendants. Trial to a jury, directed verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Deemeb, O. J.
Among other things, the defendants denied that they purchased the hogs from the plaintiff, and specifically averred that they purchased the same from plaintiff and one Thos. Yandicar, who it is claimed owned the property .at the time of the sale. Plaintiff’s evidence showed the following facts with reference to this issue: Plaintiff, Randall, was the tenant of Yandicar, who owned the land on which the hogs were raised. By the terms of their lease Yandicar was to have two-fifths of the proceeds from the land, and plaintiff three-fifths thereof. Plaintiff was raising considerable…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knapp v. IsenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Wright v. E. M. Dickey Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Kent v. CobbColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Wagner v. ButtlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co. v. EngSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.